Cases 21 - 30 of 727
Wilson v. Buckel et al
as 1:2021cv03422
Defendant:
Raquel Buckel, Daniel Paramo, CDC Officer Hugee and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Earl Wilson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gustavo Alvarez v. M. Pollard, et al
as 21-55350
Respondent:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden and PATRICK COVELLO
Respondent / Appellee:
M. POLLARD
Petitioner / Appellant:
GUSTAVO ALVAREZ
William Dawes v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 21-55079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM DAWES
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD JAYAKUMAR, Deputy Public Defender, individual and official capacity, MARTINEZ, Mrs., individual and official capacity, JONATHAN GROSSMAN, Apellate Attorney, individual and official capacity and others
Garrett v. Diaz et al
as 3:2021cv00265
Defendant:
Sergeant Salas, Larios, Ralph Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Craig K. Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Douglas Bradford v. Daniel Paramo
as 21-55038
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
DOUGLAS GORDON BRADFORD
Allen Hammler v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 20-56421
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVAREZ, C/O, P. CORTEZ, Cor. Counselor (CC2), DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Warden of RJD/SP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLEN HAMMLER
William Orren Dawes et al v. Gavin Newsom et al
as 2:2020cv11344
Defendant:
San Diego Sheriffs Department, A. Silva, Carl Eckland and others
Plaintiff:
William Orren Dawes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Liu v. Marcus Pollard
as 20-56338
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN LIU
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden and MARCUS POLLARD, Warden
Raul Arellano v. Michael Santos, et al
as 20-56305
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL BALBIN SANTOS, Primary Care Provider (Doctor)
Defendant:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES
Reginald Tanubagijo v. Daniel Paramo
as 20-17175
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
REGINALD TANUBAGIJO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
