Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Reale v. Providence and Worcester Railroad Company
as 3:2023cv00990
Plaintiff:
Daniel Reale
Defendant:
Providence and Worcester Railroad Company
Not Classified By Court:
State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Reale v. Wolfburg et al
as 3:2023cv00720
Plaintiff:
Daniel Reale
Defendant:
Daniel Wolfburg, Plainfield Police Department and Plainfield Police Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Reale v. Match Group, LLC
as 3:2021cv01571
Plaintiff:
Daniel Reale
Defendant:
Match Group, LLC and Match Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Reale v. Google LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01412
Plaintiff:
Daniel Reale
Defendant:
Google, LLC, YouTube, LLC and Alphabet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Reale v. Cunningham
as 3:2020cv00882
Defendant:
Kevin Cunningham
Plaintiff:
Daniel Reale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy et al v. Lamont
as 3:2020cv00694
Plaintiff:
Sean Murphy, Robert Barnes and Daniel Reale
Defendant:
Ned Lamont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Libertarian Party of Connecticut et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2020cv00467
Defendant:
Ned Lamont and Denise Merrill
Plaintiff:
Daniel Reale, Libertarian Party of Connecticut and Harold Harris
Petitioner:
Ethan Alcorn
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Michael Telesca, Kyle Kenley Kopitke and The Independent Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reale v. Karusuk et al
as 3:2014cv01442
Plaintiff:
Daniel Reale
Defendant:
Peter Karusuk and City of Norwich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
