Cases 1 - 10 of 11
SUTTON v. USA
as 1:2022cv00358
Petitioner:
DANIEL THOMAS SUTTON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
CARNEVALE v. CLARK et al
as 2:2019cv00842
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL HARLOW, ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Petitioner:
DANIEL THOMAS CARNEVALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curran v. USA
as 1:2017cv00709
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Daniel Thomas Curran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PEARSON et al v. MANZON et al
as 2:2017cv00500
Plaintiff:
DANIEL THOMAS PEARSON and FRANCES PEARSON
Defendant:
ALBERTO MANZON and EXNOVO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARNEVALE v. HARLOW et al
as 2:2013cv00915
Petitioner:
DANIEL THOMAS CARNEVALE
Respondent:
MICHAEL HARLOW and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCGOVERN et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv02114
Plaintiff:
DANIEL THOMAS MCGOVERN and NANCY MCGOVERN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas v. NRA Group, LLC d/b/a National Recovery Agency
as 1:2010cv02390
Plaintiff:
Danielle Thomas
Defendant:
NRA Group, LLC d/b/a National Recovery Agency
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CAMACHO v. WALSH et al
as 2:2010cv05136
Petitioner:
DANIEL THOMAS CAMACHO, JR.
Respondent:
JEROME WALSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BALDWIN v. ACANDS, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2009cv93413
Plaintiff:
DANIEL THOMAS BALDWIN
Defendant:
ACANDS, INCORPORATED, AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
