Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08360
Plaintiff:
Danielle Jones
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wallrich et al v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05506
Plaintiff:
Paula Wallrich, Danielle Jones, Grant Grinnell and others
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Jones v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2022pq01255
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wells v. Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv06245
Plaintiff:
Marvin D. Wells
Defendant:
Eddie Johnson, DM Rodriguez, A. Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Jones v. Officer Flowers et al
as 1:2016cv05276
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Defendant:
Officer Flowers, Officer Daniels and Village of Maywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hagen et al v. Bayer Pharma AG et al
as 3:2011cv12272
Plaintiff:
Cory Hagen , Danielle Jones , Stephanie Mayo and others
Defendant:
Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr et al v. Jones et al
as 3:2008cv00013
Plaintiff:
Phyllis A. Carr and H. B. Carr
Defendant:
Daniel Jones and Ruan Leasing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
