Cases 1 - 10 of 15
HALE v. HALE et al
as 3:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE HALE
Defendant:
SHERIFF JAMES HALE and OCONEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Hale et al
as 2:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Hale
Defendant:
Sheriff James Hale and Oconee County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odom v. Loman et al
as 1:2022cv05144
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Odom
Defendant:
Daniel Lee Loman and Crown Equipment Corporation doing business as Crown Lift Trucks
Not Classified By Court:
Progressive Premier Insurance Company of Illinois
Cross Defendant:
Crown Equipment Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
BERG v. TRICE et al
as 5:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE BERG
Defendant:
CAPTAIN TONY TRICE, SGT BILL LAVENDAR, ASHLEY GREER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. TERRY et al
as 4:2021cv00192
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEE BAKER, JR, GABRIELLE ALLIAHA BAKER, DANIELLE LEE BAKER and others
Defendant:
TERRY, BOBBY PETERS, Sheriff J J JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton v. Saul
as 6:2019cv00090
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Not Yet Classified:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Burton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. Unnamed Respondent
as 1:2017cv03834
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Williams
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00047
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Clark
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Williams v. Unnamed Defendant
as 1:2015cv04202
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Williams
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant and Cobb Co. Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
