Cases 41 - 50 of 160
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Missouri, State of et al v. Biden et al
as 4:2021cv01329
Plaintiff:
Missouri, State of, Nebraska, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., United States of America, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Interested Party:
Reliant Care Management Company, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Addison et al v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 4:2021mc09187
Plaintiff:
Angela Addison, Charlene Alewel, Kim Anderson and others
Defendant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Addison et al v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 4:2021cv09187
Plaintiff:
Angela Addison, Charlene Alewel, Kim Anderson and others
Defendant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00801
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Boevingloh v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04104
Plaintiff:
Daniel Boevingloh
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc. and ABBOTT OSBORN JACOBS PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Vaughn v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2021cv00504
Plaintiff:
William Vaughn and Mosias
Defendant:
Tim Fitch, Saint Louis County Assessor, State of Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maritz Holdings Inc. et al v. Carter et al
as 4:2021cv00438
Defendant:
Chris Dornfeld, Ben Valenti, Jesse Wolfersberger and others
Plaintiff:
Maritz Holdings Inc. and Maritz Motivation Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
