Cases 1 - 10 of 147
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
FERRIS v. BIBOON, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02017
Plaintiff:
TYLER FERRIS
Defendant:
BIBOON, LLC doing business as BRIDGE LENDING SOLUTIONS, LDF HOLDINGS, LLC, BRITTANY ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC. v. CHILLEMI et al
as 1:2022cv02124
Plaintiff:
UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
Defendant:
DANIEL CHILLEMI, BRENDON HARBRON, DAVID BARTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
WEINSCHENK v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2022cv01150
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WEINSCHENK
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, ERIC HOLCOMB, SUZANNE CROUCH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
KELLY v. DORMAN et al
as 4:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
MARK KELLY
Defendant:
DANIEL DORMAN, DAVID WRIGHT, CHRISTOPHER HANSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
VASQUEZ v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv01693
Plaintiff:
RICARDO VASQUEZ
Defendant:
INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH BLOOMINGTON, INC., INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, INC., Daniel Handel and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
