Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SASSER v. CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Dr. Stephen Daniel Sasser and STEPHEN DANIEL SASSER, MD
Defendant:
CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES, PALMETTO GBA, LLC, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
SILVA v. SWIFT
as 1:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES SILVA
Defendant:
TAYLOR ALISON SWIFT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SILVA v. SWIFT et al
as 1:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES SILVA
Defendant:
TAYLOR ALISON SWIFT and NASHVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SILVA v. SWIFT
as 1:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES SILVA
Defendant:
TAYLOR ALISON SWIFT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BRATTAIN v. STANLEY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 1:2019cv01037
Plaintiff:
RUTH BRATTAIN
Defendant:
STANLEY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, KAREN MORGAN, LEIGH HAYES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRATTAIN V. STANLY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, ET AL.
as 1:2017cv00771
Defendant:
STANLY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, DANIEL GOODMAN, LEIGH HAYES and others
Plaintiff:
RUTH BRATTAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. NASH
as 1:2016mc00059
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Defendant:
DANIEL CHARLES NASH
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SCHOULTZ
as 1:2016mc00023
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DANIEL SCHOULTZ
SEAMAN V. DUKE UNIVERSITY, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00462
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE SEAMAN
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY and DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
