Cases 31 - 40 of 1,284
Bojangles' Restaurants, Inc. v. Robert Stafford, Jr.
as 23-282
Petitioner:
BOJANGLES' RESTAURANTS, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
ROBERT E. STAFFORD, JR., on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, MELISSA BONETTI, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, HERBERT MALLET, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
US v. Quinnon Daniels
as 23-4662
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
QUINNON DANIELS, a/k/a Q, a/k/a Quinon Lashaunn Daniels
Lula Williams v. Matt Martorello
as 23-2097
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LULA WILLIAMS, GLORIA TURNAGE, GEORGE HENGLE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MATT MARTORELLO
Defendant:
BIG PICTURE LOANS, LLC, ASCENSION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DANIEL GRAVEL and others
US v. Daniel Banks
as 23-4623
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL BANKS
Daniel Hernandez-Cruz v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1997
Petitioner:
DANIEL ANTONIO HERNANDEZ-CRUZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Jonathan Newell v. Paul Newby
as 23-6926
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN JAMES NEWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL MARTIN NEWBY, Chief Justice, North Carolina Supreme Court, LINDA MCGEE, Trustee (pty), Chief Judge, North Carolina Court of Appeals, MARION WARREN, Director, Administrative Office of the Courts and others
Sunday Egahi v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1974
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUNDAY NGBEDE EGAHI
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, DANIEL M. RENAUD, Director of the USCIS Vermont Service Center and others
Garth Richmond, II v. Rick White
as 23-6909
Petitioner / Appellant:
GARTH DANIEL RICHMOND, II
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN RICK WHITE
Kelly Bass v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6847
Petitioner:
KELLY DANIEL BASS
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Respondent / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
