Cases 31 - 40 of 353
Wyrick v. Dombrowsky et al
as 5:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Wyrick
Defendant:
Heather Dombrowsky, Terry Fults, Matthew Step and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lancaster v. Pine Meadowsidence OPCO, LLC
as 5:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lancaster
Defendant:
Pine Meadowsidence OPCO, LLC doing business as Pine Meadows Post Acute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Dawan v. Eastern State Hospital
as 5:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
Yusef Mujahid Dawan and Daniel Joseph Williams
Defendant:
Eastern State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hendrickson et al
as 6:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. Jones
Defendant:
Kent Hendrickson, Glenn E. Acree, Christopher Nickell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Joyner et al
as 7:2022cv00082
Petitioner:
Derrick Smith
Respondent:
H. Joyner, D. Altizer, Crum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Segura-Corro v. USA
as 5:2022cv00190
Petitioner:
Daniel Segura-Corro
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Daniel v. AG Bells, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Beryl Daniel, Jr.
Defendant:
AG Bells, LLC and Savannah Quesada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Haley v. Akers
as 5:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
Bruce Dewayne Haley
Respondent:
Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Werman v. Joyner et al
as 2:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Alfred Werman
Defendant:
Warden H. Joyner, Psycology Dr. Lefever, Mr. Melvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Werman v. Joyner et al
as 7:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Alfred Werman
Defendant:
H. Joyner, Dr. Lefever, Mr. Melvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
