Cases 31 - 40 of 1,387
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00224
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LivaNova USA Inc v. DiLorenzo et al
as 2:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
LivaNova USA, Inc. and LivaNova USA Inc
Defendant:
Dr. Daniel J. DiLorenzo, DiLorenzo Biomedical, LLC, Daniel J DiLorenzo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Schaab et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 3:2024cv05083
Plaintiff:
Jared Schaab and Danielle Schaab
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Bateman v. Hawk et al
as 2:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bateman
Defendant:
Jason Hawk, Robert Melvin, City of Newcastle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Young et al
as 3:2024cv05077
Plaintiff:
Devon Marteen Daniels
Defendant:
Brian Young, John Ringer and Mary Robinette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Daniels v. DKP Administration Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Eddie Daniels
Defendant:
DKP Administration Inc and Lyndon Southern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
