Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Cox v. Board of Parole et al
as 8:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Travis Cox
Defendant:
Board of Parole, Office of Parole Supervision, Office of Parole Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El v. Daniels et al
as 8:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Binyamin El
Defendant:
Vernon C.R. Daniels, Kimberly M. Pankonin, Douglas County Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lightfeather v. McDonald et al
as 8:2021cv00067
Defendant:
Officer McDonald, One Unknown Corrections Officer, Crapo and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mueller v. Meyers
as 8:2020cv00459
Respondent:
Meyers
Petitioner:
Jason Daniel Mueller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Campbell v. Frankes
as 8:2020cv00092
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Scott Frankes
Petitioner:
Daniel J. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Glazebrook v. Frakes
as 8:2020cv00071
Respondent:
Scott Frakes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Daniel G. Glazebrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dober v. Wasmer
as 8:2019cv00514
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Todd Wasmer
Petitioner:
Daniel J. Dober
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Guitierrez-Huerta v. Mary Lanning Hospital et al
as 8:2019cv00321
Defendant:
Magee, Kyle Woodworth, Det. Dana Dramse and others
Plaintiff:
Angel O. Guitierrez-Huerta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler v. Ricketts et al
as 8:2019cv00266
Defendant:
Pete Ricketts, Daniel Birdsahl, Robert B. Evnen and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Novascone v. Nebraska Dept. of Correctional Services et al
as 8:2019cv00201
Defendant:
Daniel Danaher, Nebraska Dept. of Correctional Services and Timothy Chamberlain
Plaintiff:
Colton J. Novascone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
