Cases 1 - 10 of 767
PNC Bank, National Association, as successor-in-interest to BBVA USA v. Yoo
as 3:2024cv01146
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, National Association, as successor-in-interest to BBVA USA
Defendant:
Danny Yoo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Banks v. Warden-FCI Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Danny Lee Banks
Respondent:
Warden-FCI Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mixon v. Cross et al
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Danny Mixon
Defendant:
Ms. Cross, Mr. Osobrook and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silo Technologies, Inc. v. B&R Express LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00831
Plaintiff:
Silo Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
B&R Express LLC and Danny Baquero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sims v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00450
Petitioner:
Danny J. Sims
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Greenway v. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary et al
as 4:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Dr. Adam W. Greenway
Defendant:
Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary and Danny Roberts
Rodriguez et al v. Seanez et al
as 3:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Trinidad Rodriguez and alicia rodriguez
Defendant:
Danny Seanez and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hillman v. Hillman et al
as 9:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Danny A. Hillman
Defendant:
Michelle Hillman, Diane Robinson, Sugar Tiffany Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Arais et al
as 3:2023cv02634
Plaintiff:
Demetrus Brown
Defendant:
Pedro Arais, Danny Wood Trucking LLC and RW Timms Leasimg LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
