Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2ot Job Discrimination (other)
Halousek v. State of California et al
as 4:2023cv03984
Plaintiff:
Sheila Halousek
Defendant:
State of California, Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento, Superior Court of California, County of Yuba and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Danny Lee Freeman v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2019cv09099
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Freeman
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
William Ryan Key et al v. Jarad A. Higgins et al
as 2:2019cv09034
Defendant:
Nicholas Mira, Grade A Productions, LLC, Songs of Universal, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
William Ryan Key, Longineu Warren Parsons, Peter Michael Mosely and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Thompson v. State of California et al
as 3:2018cv07532
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and State of California
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodman et al v. AT&T Corp.
as 3:2016cv04861
Plaintiff:
Paul Goodman , Willis Kindley , Timothy M. Kunst and others
Defendant:
AT&T Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Danny Lee Barbera v. SMTCL USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05620
Defendant:
Does 1-10 and SMTCL USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Barbera
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Eve H Wagner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Karlene Ann Williams et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 5:2013cv01875
Defendant:
Does and Pfizer Inc
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Williams and Karlene Ann Williams
Danny Lee v. U S Bank National Association et al
as 8:2009cv01057
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee and Danny Lee
Defendant:
U S Bank National Association, U S Bank National Association, U S Bank National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
