Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Roybal v. Darden Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01046
Plaintiff:
Joseph Roybal
Defendant:
Darden Restaurants, Inc. and Darden Concepts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Escovedo v. Darden Concepts, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00943
Plaintiff:
Lorie Escovedo
Defendant:
Darden Concepts, Inc. and Darden Concepts, Inc. a Florida For-Profit Corporation doing business as Cheddar's Scratch Kitchen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Anderson v. Darden Restaurants, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02769
Plaintiff:
Renee Anderson
Defendant:
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parish v. Rare Hospitality Management, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv02903
Defendant:
Darden GC Corp., Darden SV, Inc., Rare Hospitality Management, LLC d/b/a Longhorn Steakhouse and others
Plaintiff:
Stephan Alexander Parish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Seasons of Albuquerque, LLC v. Darden Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00318
Plaintiff:
Seasons of Albuquerque, LLC
Defendant:
Darden Restaurants, Inc. , Darden Concepts, Inc. and Seasons 52 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anderson v. Darden Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02052
Plaintiff:
Renee Anderson
Defendant:
Darden Restaurants, Inc. and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cruz et al v. Johnson Matthey Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00268
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Cruz , Scott Bender , Konark Ogra and others
Defendant:
Johnson Matthey Inc. , University of Tulsa, The , Chevron Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Darden v. Patton
as 14-6235
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES DARDEN
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT PATTON, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Darden v. Wilkinson
as 5:2013cv00392
Petitioner:
Charles Darden
Respondent:
Tim Wilkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
