Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Soto v. Coweta County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Darius Jason Soto
Defendant:
Coweta County Sheriff's Office, Josh Joyner, Debra Found and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Escambia County
as 1:2023cv02886
Plaintiff:
Darius Matthews
Defendant:
Escambia County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUNN v. TOBY
as 1:2023cv02515
Petitioner:
DARIUS JARRELL DUNN
Respondent:
Annette Toby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUNN v. TOBY
as 5:2023cv00179
Petitioner:
DARIUS JARRELL DUNN
Respondent:
WARDEN ANNETTE TOBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthews v. Gwinnett County Detention Center
as 1:2023cv01484
Plaintiff:
Darius A. Matthews
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Escambia County Alabama Drug Task Force et al
as 1:2023cv00838
Plaintiff:
Darius Matthews
Defendant:
Escambia County Alabama Drug Task Force and Det. Lt Talik Stables
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maslow v. Warden et al
as 4:2022cv00242
Petitioner:
Thomas Maslow
Respondent:
Warden, Honorable Mrs. Suzanne Smith, Mrs. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Lotti et al
as 1:2022cv04193
Plaintiff:
Robert Jerome Wright
Defendant:
Vincent A. Lotti, Darius Pattilo, Sabriya H. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. Thomas
as 6:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Darius Tucker
Defendant:
Dr. Dilip Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emory v. Thomas
as 3:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Darius Emory and Darious Emory
Defendant:
Karen Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
