Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Welch v. Marquez et al
as 1:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Darius Welch
Defendant:
J. Marquez, B. Pitts, S. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Murphy
as 1:2023cv16279
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Darius Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Welch v. C.C.D.O.C. et al
as 1:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Darius Welch
Defendant:
C.C.D.O.C., Tom Dart and Sgt. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robie v. Thompson et al
as 1:2022cv06354
Plaintiff:
Derrick Robie
Defendant:
Darius Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. G. Pitchford et al
as 1:2022cv04906
Plaintiff:
Darius Phillips
Defendant:
G. Pitchford, Donald Shelton and Illinois Prisoner Review Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Director of B.O.P. et al
as 1:2022cv02459
Plaintiff:
Darius J. Murphy
Defendant:
Director of B.O.P., Warden of Metropolition Correctional Center, Lt. Joy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dickerson v. City of Chicago, a municipal corporation et al
as 1:2021cv02955
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, City of Chicago, a municipal corporation and Chicago Police Department
Plaintiff:
Darius Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Ciolli
as 3:2021cv50121
Petitioner:
Darius Williams
Respondent:
Ciolo and Andrew Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mosley v. Dart et al
as 1:2020cv06653
Defendant:
DaBrownski, Superintendent Walsh, Tom Dart and others
Plaintiff:
Darius Drew Mosley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Magee v. Menella et al
as 1:2020cv06088
Plaintiff:
Mr. Darius Magee and Darius Magee
Defendant:
Ms. Sabrina, Ms. Connie Menella and Connie Menella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
