Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Prigg v. Shellenberger et al
as 1:2023cv01194
Plaintiff:
Darius Lamont Prigg
Defendant:
Scott D. Shellenberger, Brian D. Botts and Det. J. Gensel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00791
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Prigg v. Pesterfield
as 1:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Darius Lamont Prigg
Defendant:
Walt Pesterfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Horton et al
as 1:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Bryant E. Davis and Bryant Davidson
Defendant:
Darius Horton, Express Funeral Funding, Hartford, The Hartford Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Prigg v. Baltimore County Department of Corrections Towson District et al
as 1:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Darius L. Prigg
Defendant:
Baltimore County Department of Corrections Towson District, Srgt Carr and Lt. McDowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Prigg v. Baltimore County Department of Corrections, et al.
as 1:2022cv03105
Plaintiff:
Darius Lamont Prigg
Defendant:
Baltimore County Department of Corrections, Ofc. Walker, Ofc. Sherman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Joyner v. Director Gail Watts et al
as 1:2022cv01907
Plaintiff:
Darios Q Joyner and Darius Q. Joyner
Defendant:
Director Gail Watts, Deputy Director Renard Brooks, Major Robert Alford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Junior v. USA-2255
as 1:2020cv01693
Petitioner:
Darius Junior
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Frazier v. USA-2255
as 1:2020cv01575
Petitioner:
Darius Frazier
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Glover v. Upole
as 8:2020cv00527
Defendant:
Sgt. J. Upole
Plaintiff:
Darius Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
