Other Statutes Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
In re: Syngenta AG MIR162
as 20-3000
Appellant: HAGEN & HAGEN, P.C., CHAPMAN LAW LLC, DENNEY & BARRETT, PC and others
Appellee: TEEL & MARONEY, PLC, ABREO & CARTER, SLAVEN LAW GROUP and others
Plaintiff: CHARLES B. LEX, TRIPLE BG PARTNERSHIP, DAVID POLIFKA REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST and others
Defendant: SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG, SYNGENTA SEEDS, LLC, FKA Syngenta Seeds, Inc., SYNGENTA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. and others
In re: Syngenta AG MIR162
as 19-3172
Not Yet Classified: HAGEN & HAGEN, P.C., CHAPMAN LAW LLC, DENNEY & BARRETT, PC and others
Plaintiff: CHARLES B. LEX, TRIPLE BG PARTNERSHIP, DAVID POLIFKA REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST and others
Defendant: SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG, SYNGENTA SEEDS, LLC, FKA Syngenta Seeds, Inc., SYNGENTA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. and others
In re: Syngenta AG MIR162
as 19-3082
Not Yet Classified: HAGEN & HAGEN, P.C., CHAPMAN LAW LLC, DENNEY & BARRETT, PC and others
Plaintiff: CHARLES B. LEX, TRIPLE BG PARTNERSHIP, DAVID POLIFKA REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST and others
Defendant: SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG, SYNGENTA SEEDS, LLC, FKA Syngenta Seeds, Inc., SYNGENTA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. and others
Bernicke v. Darling et al
as 2:2016cv00831
Plaintiff: Karen L. Bernicke
Defendant: S. Hoby Darling, Scott Olivet, Greg Warnock and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Paprakis v. Skullcandy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00810
Plaintiff: Rose Paprakis
Defendant: Skullcandy, S. Hoby Darling, Doug Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Oswald v. Skullcandy et al
as 2:2016cv00246
Plaintiff: Marjorie B. Oswald
Defendant: Skullcandy , Seth Darling , Jason Hodell and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Davis v. Skullcandy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00121
Plaintiff: Melanie Davis
Defendant: Skullcandy, Seth Darling, Jason Hodell and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?