Cases 1 - 3 of 3
James Jensen, et al v. MN Dept. of Human Services, et al
as 20-1399
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Darren Allen, as parents, guardians and next friends of Thomas M. Allbrink and others similarly situated, James Brinker, James Jensen and others
Defendant:
Director, Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a program of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota, Clinical Director, the Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a program of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota, Douglas Bratvold, individually, and as Director of the Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a progam of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota and State of Minnesota
James Jensen, et al v. MN Dept. of Human Services, et al
as 20-1126
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Darren Allen, as parents, guardians and next friends of Thomas M. Allbrink and others similarly situated, James Brinker, James Jensen and others
Defendant:
Director, Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a program of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota, Clinical Director, the Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a program of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota, Douglas Bratvold, individually, and as Director of the Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a progam of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota and State of Minnesota
Smith, et al. v. Ruan Logistics Corporation, et al
as 2:2013cv01154
Defendant:
Ruan Logistics Corporation and Jim Williams
Plaintiff:
James Steven Smith , Jeremy Jackson Dotson , Aron K Cardenas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
