Cases 11 - 20 of 258
Michael Seals v. K. Allison, et al
as 20-17432
Defendant / Appellee:
R. DIAZ, D. DAVEY, D. GOREE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL IZELL SEALS
Relmon Davis, III v. Gibson, et al
as 20-17069
Defendant / Appellee:
GIBSON, Warden, official capacity, GOVERNMENT CLAIMS PROGRAM, official capacity, CHIEF INMATE APPEALS BRANCH DCR, Third level Appeals review staff, official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RELMON H. DAVIS III
Danny Cohea v. C. Ducart, et al
as 20-17383
Defendant / Appellee:
C. E. DUCART, L. SAPORETTI, Correctional Counselor I, PBSP, D. BRADBURY, Chief Deputy Warden, PBSP and others
Defendant:
C. LESNIAK, Correctional Captain, C. DENMAN, Correctional Sergeant, SABRINA JOHNSON, Chief Deputy Warden, Corcoran and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY JAMES COHEA
Matthew Dennis v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 20-16392
Defendant / Appellee:
Y. MANSOUR, SCOTT KERNAN, B. LEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW DENNIS
Salvador Rios Romo v. Dave Davey
as 20-55272
Petitioner / Appellant:
SALVADOR RIOS ROMO
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVE DAVEY, Warden
(PC) VanFossan v. Alcantar et al
as 1:2020cv00173
Defendant:
R. Godwin, T. Lee, M. Mercado and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin VanFossan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) VanFossan v. Alcantar et al
as 2:2020cv00187
Defendant:
R. Godwin, T. Lee, M. Mercado and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin VanFossan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damon Cook v. Dave Davey
as 19-56351
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAMON B. COOK
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVE DAVEY, Warden
Danny Cohea v. Dave Davey, et al
as 19-17250
Defendant / Appellee:
I. BUENO, S. PONCE, M. S. ROBICHEAUX and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY JAMES COHEA
(PC) Cohea v. Davey et al
as 1:2019cv01281
Defendant:
E. Sanchez, Dave Davey, I Bueno and others
Plaintiff:
Danny James Cohea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
