Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Carter v. Highberger et al
as 6:2023cv01634
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Carter
Defendant:
Mr. J. Highberger and Mr. T. Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pico v. Cooke et al
as 6:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Marcos Andres Pico
Defendant:
Shari Cooke, Michelle Messenger, Karon Stanek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ros v. Davenport et al
as 6:2022cv00495
Plaintiff:
Russell Ros
Defendant:
Trisha Davenport, Joshua Highberger, Gerald Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Peters
as 6:2022cv00015
Petitioner:
James Dimitri Davenport
Respondent:
Collete Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davenport v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2020cv00354
Plaintiff:
Lawnee M. Davenport
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Sarah Davenport
as 3:2017ad00084
In Re:
Sarah Davenport
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Davenport v. USA
as 3:2017cv00304
Petitioner:
Ronald Craig Davenport
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McCabe v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2016cv01775
Defendant:
C. Casper, J. Cook, S. Cost-Streety and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe McCabe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wickham v. Oregon Department of Corrections, DOC et al
as 6:2016cv00814
Defendant:
Ms. Adretti, Joan Barton, Brian Belleque and others
Plaintiff:
David Wickham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv00723
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
