Cases 1 - 10 of 702
Edwards v. Bradley
as 5:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Kareem M. Edwards
Defendant:
Warden David Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dike v. Knight et al
as 5:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Vickie Diane Dike
Defendant:
David Knight, Trey English, Heather McGinness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feltner v. Kentucky River Regional Authority et al
as 6:2024cv00059
Executor:
Kendra Feltner
Defendant:
Kentucky River Regional Authority, Kentucky River Regional Jail, Inc., Perry County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hedges v. Gordon et al
as 5:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
David C. Hedges
Defendant:
Deputy Thomas Gordon, Deputy LT Brittany Sydney, LT Jamie Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Brown et al
as 5:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
David Kris Hall
Defendant:
Rodney Brown and Derrick Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Green
as 0:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Tarell Thomas
Respondent:
James David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomason v. Knight
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Thomason
Defendant:
David Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Knight et al
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Kelly Michelle Johnson
Defendant:
Jailer David Knight, Nurse Kristy and Deputy Jailer Jennifer Bounds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Maness et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Clarence Vaughn
Defendant:
Blake Maness, John Michael Hill, David Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Knight
as 5:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell
Defendant:
David Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
