Cases 1 - 10 of 1,240
Alan v. United States of America IRS
as 6:2024cv06290
Plaintiff:
David P. Alan
Defendant:
United States of America IRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Czekaj v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
David Czekaj
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jacobs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
David Jacobs
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Haight v. Orleans County Sheriff et al
as 1:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Terrence Haight
Defendant:
Orleans County Sheriff, County of Orleans, David Lauer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Schuse v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Michael David Schuse
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Chapman David v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06214
Plaintiff:
Amber J Chapman David
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kuriatnyk v. Piper et al
as 6:2024cv06196
Plaintiff:
Steven Kuriatnyk
Defendant:
Christopher Piper, Samantha Simonetti, David Blaho and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gorton v. Village of Sodus et al
as 6:2024cv06195
Plaintiff:
Victoria E Gorton
Defendant:
Village of Sodus, David Dyminski, Kevin Druschel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schultz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
David Schultz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Worthy v. Rodwin et al
as 1:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Worthy
Defendant:
Lisa Rodwin and David S. Sarkovics
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
