Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Vidale Tasby v. Burl Cain, Warden, et al
as 17-30927
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIDALE TASBY
Defendant - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, CAROL DUTHU, Mental Health Director and others
Tasby v. Cain et al
as 3:2016cv00277
Defendant:
David Ankenbrand, N. Burl Cain, Carol Duthu and others
Plaintiff:
Vidale Tasby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Haynes v. LA Dept of Public Sfty & Corr, et al
as 16-30235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS HAYNES
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS, JAMES LEBLANC, Secretary, Individual and Official Capacity, BURL CAIN, Warden, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Wade v. Cain
as 3:2015cv00737
Defendant:
David Ankenbrand, M. Bordelon, N. Burl Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haggard v. DarBonne et al
as 3:2015cv00395
Defendant:
David Ankenbrand, R. Augustine, Chad DarBonne and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Haggard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCall v. Poret et al
as 3:2015cv00194
Defendant:
David Ankenbrand, Trent Barton, Troy Poret and others
Plaintiff:
Eric McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph v. Ankenbrand et al
as 3:2014cv00078
Defendant:
David Ankenbrand, Robert Butler, N. Burl Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horne v. Reinbold et al
as 3:2012cv00057
Defendant:
David Ankenbrand and William Reinbold
Plaintiff:
Lemoine Horne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. Cain et al
as 3:2010cv00575
Defendant:
David Ankenbrand, Trent Barton, Burl N. Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
