Cases 11 - 20 of 118
Sheppard v. Duke
as 7:2022cv00089
Petitioner:
Rodney Sheppard, Jr.
Respondent:
Jordan Sandoval, Sheriff David Duke and Marty Cannedy's Secretary Ms. Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Peters v. Duke, Sheriff, Wichita County, Texas
as 7:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
Marc Arron Peters
Defendant:
David Duke, Sheriff, Wichita County, Texas, Sgt. Reynolds, Sheriff Dept-Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKnight v. Duke, Sheriff, Wichita County, Texas
as 7:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
William McKnight
Defendant:
David Duke, Sheriff, Wichita County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez v. Duke
as 7:2022cv00023
Defendant:
Santos V. Hernandez and David Duke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKnight v. Unknown Defendant
as 7:2021cv00131
Petitioner:
William McKnight
Respondent:
Unknown Defendant and David Duke, Sheriff, Wichita County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Anthony Booker v. Wichita County Detention Ctr, et al
as 20-11026
Defendant / Appellee:
Wichita Falls City Manager, David Dukes, Sheriff, Wichita County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Dewayne Booker
Yarbrough v. Duke
as 7:2020cv00121
Defendant:
Sheriff David Duke
Plaintiff:
David Yarbrough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGowan v. Duke et al
as 7:2020cv00114
Defendant:
David Duke and Lisa Patterson
Plaintiff:
Mario McGowan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv50730
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID DUKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv42341
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID DUKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
