Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Carter v. Dart et al
as 1:2010cv02596
Plaintiff:
Larry Carter
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, David Fagus and Avery Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. County of Cook, Illinois et al
as 1:2010cv01375
Plaintiff:
Nelson L. Bryant
Defendant:
County of Cook, Illinois, Thomas Dart, Salvador Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tijerina v. Fagus et al
as 1:2010cv00976
Plaintiff:
Jesse Tijerina
Defendant:
David Fagus, Avery Hart, Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Dart et al
as 1:2010cv00160
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Wilson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Avery Hart and David Fagus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parish v. Cook County et al
as 1:2009cv07265
Plaintiff:
Micheal J. Parish
Defendant:
Cook County, David Fagus, Nurse Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aleman v. Cook County Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv06049
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Aleman
Defendant:
Cook County Dept. of Corrections, Thomas Dart, Avery Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2009cv05998
Plaintiff:
Terry Price and Prentice Dockery
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Salvador Godinez, Michael Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCorker v. Cook County Dept. of Corr. et al
as 1:2009cv05949
Plaintiff:
Lee McCorker
Defendant:
Cook County Dept. of Corr., David Fagus and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Dart et al
as 1:2009cv04612
Plaintiff:
Tony Love
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Salvador Godinez and David Fagus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giles v. Fagus et al
as 1:2009cv04303
Plaintiff:
Bruce Giles
Defendant:
David Fagus and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
