Cases 31 - 40 of 44
PGT Industries Inc v. Harris & Pritchard Contracting Services LLC et al
as 2:2012mc00327
Plaintiff:
PGT Industries Inc
Defendant:
Harris & Pritchard Contracting Services LLC and David Harris
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv07378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Harris v. Enterprise Recovery Systems Inc.
as 1:2011cv03151
Defendant:
Enterprise Recovery Systems Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Harris
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Reena Frailich, et al v. McGuire Woods, LLP
as 10-55342
Plaintiff - Appellee:
REENA B. FRAILICH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, JENNIFER BRAZEAL, KARI BREWER and others
Plaintiff:
LISA GINTZ, on behalf of themselves and all others similary situated, RYAN RODRIGUEZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and LOREDANA NESCI
Appellant:
SANDRA DISNER, Executor of the Estate of Eliot G. Disner, as successor-in-interest to Eliot G. Disner and Disner Law Corporation, Class Counsel, MCGUIRE WOODS, LLP, FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP and others
Objector:
ARCELIA TREVINO, SINDELL AND SIEGEL, DAVID FELDMAN and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff:
BRIAN SCHALL, ANAND L. DANIELL and NICHOLAS D. MERMIGES
Defendant:
WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, DBA BAR/BRI and KAPLAN, INC., a Delaware corporation
Movant:
RICHARD A. BODMER and PAMELA COLLINS DUNMORE
Reena Frailich, et al v. Sandra Disner, et al
as 10-55309
Plaintiff - Appellee:
REENA B. FRAILICH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, JENNIFER BRAZEAL, KARI BREWER and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN RODRIGUEZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, LISA GINTZ and LOREDANA NESCI
Appellant:
SANDRA DISNER, Executor of the Estate of Eliot G. Disner, as successor-in-interest to Eliot G. Disner and Disner Law Corporation, Class Counsel, MCGUIRE WOODS, LLP, FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP and others
Objector:
ARCELIA TREVINO, SINDELL AND SIEGEL, DAVID FELDMAN and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff:
BRIAN SCHALL, ANAND L. DANIELL and NICHOLAS D. MERMIGES
Defendant:
WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, DBA BAR/BRI and KAPLAN, INC., a Delaware corporation
Movant:
RICHARD A. BODMER and PAMELA COLLINS DUNMORE
Ryan Rodriguez, et al v. West Publishing Corporation, et al
as 09-56500
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RYAN RODRIGUEZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, REENA B. FRAILICH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, JENNIFER BRAZEAL and others
Objector - Appellant:
ROBERT JOSEPH GAUDET, Jr.
Objector:
SARAH SIEGEL, EVANS & MULLINIX, PA, JENNIFER BROWN MCELROY and others
Intervenor:
BRIAN SCHALL, ANAND L. DANIELL and NICHOLAS D. MERMIGES
Defendant:
WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, DBA BAR/BRI, KAPLAN, INC., A Delaware corporation and THOMSON CORPORATION
Movant:
RICHARD A. BODMER and PAMELA COLLINS DUNMORE
BRODY v. JK MOVING & STORAGE INC et al
as 1:2009cv01588
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD L. BRODY
Defendant:
JK MOVING & STORAGE INC, CHARLES SANFORD KUHN, DAVID HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ryan Rodriguez, et al v. West Publishing Corporation, et al
as 09-56314
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RYAN RODRIGUEZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, REENA B. FRAILICH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, JENNIFER BRAZEAL and others
Objector - Appellant:
SARAH SIEGEL, EVANS & MULLINIX, PA, JENNIFER BROWN MCELROY and others
Objector:
GEORGE SCHNEIDER, Class Member, JONATHAN M. SLOMBA, Class Member, JAMES PUNTUMAPANITCH, Class Member and others
Intervenor:
BRIAN SCHALL, ANAND L. DANIELL and NICHOLAS D. MERMIGES
Defendant:
WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, DBA BAR/BRI, KAPLAN, INC., A Delaware corporation and THOMSON CORPORATION
Movant:
RICHARD A. BODMER and PAMELA COLLINS DUNMORE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
