Cases 1 - 10 of 11
David Posta v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10613
Petitioner:
DAVID JOHN POSTA
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Posta v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2023cv60656
Plaintiff:
David John Posta
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lonich v. Carvajal et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00864
Defendant:
Hugh Hurwitz, David Brewer, Demetrius Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
David John Lonich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Billups v. Bankson et al
as 4:2011cv02896
Petitioner:
David John Billups
Respondent:
Duwayne Bankson and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David John McGuigan v. USA
as 10-10951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID JOHN MCGUIGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
USA, Known and Unknown Federal and State Agents
McGuigan v. United States of America
as 6:2010cv00234
Petitioner:
David John McGuigan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGuigan v. United States of America
as 8:2010cv00454
Petitioner:
David John McGuigan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McGuigan v. Jarvis et al
as 6:2009cv01719
Petitioner:
David John McGuigan
Respondent:
Tamara Jarvis, Jay Gilchrist Trezevant, Rachelle DesVaux Bedke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McGuigan v. USA
as 8:2009cv00254
Plaintiff:
David John McGuigan
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv02430
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
