Cases 1 - 9 of 9
JOHNSON JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20538
Plaintiff:
DAVID JOHNSON JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19452
Plaintiff:
DAVID JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holbrook et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Darrell Holbrook, Tammy Holbrook, Eddie Bentley and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Mine Safety Appliances Company, LLC, American Optical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
JOHNSON JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv22888
Plaintiff:
DAVID JOHNSON JR
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Janssen Research & Development LLC
as 2:2016cv12053
Plaintiff:
David Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Janssen Research & Development LLC
as 2:2016cv11269
Plaintiff:
David Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Balzano, et al v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv06582
Plaintiff:
Aniello Balzano , Robert J Calleja , Ronald Horoshko and others
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Napoles v. Johnson
as 1:2012cv10220
Defendant:
David Johnson, Sr. and David Johnson, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Cristian Napoles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
DOUGHERTY et al v. LITTLE BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION LLC et al
as 2:2011cv05913
Plaintiff:
LAUREN DOUGHERTY and GERALD LYNCH
Defendant:
LITTLE BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION LLC and DAVID JOHNSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
