Other Statutes Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Scott JohnsonIn re: Scott Johnson
as 22-2198
Petitioner: In re: SCOTT DAVID JOHNSON
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY
HILLEL v. AMAG PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv15569
Defendant: AMAG PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., DAVEY S. SCOON, GINO SANTINI and others
Plaintiff: RICHARD HILLEL
Turner v. AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01417
Defendant: Davey S. Scoon, AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Kathrine O'Brien and others
Plaintiff: Ervin Turner
Wang v. AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01403
Defendant: AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Davey S. Scoon, Gino Santini and others
Plaintiff: Elaine Wang
David Johnson v. Commissioner Social Security
as 20-1617
Plaintiff / Appellee: DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellant: COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00630
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
SOLIS v. LATIUM NETWORK, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv10255
Plaintiff: JOEVANNIE SOLIS
Defendant: LATIUM NETWORK, INC. , DAVID JOHNSON and MATTHEW CARDEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
USA/US Postal Inspection Service v. In the Matter of the Search of a parcel bearing priority mail #9505515827337289161711 addressed to David Johnson, 439 W Arlington St. Shenandoah, PA 17976
as 1:2017mc00595
Plaintiff: USA/US Postal Inspection Service
Defendant: In the Matter of the Search of a parcel bearing priority mail #9505515827337289161711 addressed to David Johnson, 439 W Arlington St. Shenandoah, PA 17976
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02199
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Scott Johnson
as 14-1518
Petitioner: SCOTT DAVID JOHNSON
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?