Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Buess v. Obama et al
as 3:2013cv02209
Plaintiff:
David L. Buess
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Hancock Federal Credit Union, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Buess, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 13-4008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L. BUESS and WINONA MAE PALMIOTTI
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, President and CEO United States of America, doing business as The White House Corporation, HANCOCK FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
David Buess, et al v. Paul Piscitelli, et al
as 13-3886
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L. BUESS, WINONA MAE PALMIOTTI and W. R. P., a minor child underneath the age of 18
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL PISCITELLI, ANDREW M CUOMO, Governor of New York, County/Territory/State of New York, SUFFOLK COUNTY, Office of the Commissioner(s) and others
Buess et al v. Obama et al
as 3:2013cv01228
Plaintiff:
David L. Buess and Winona Mae Palmiotti
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Hancock Federal Credit Union, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Buess et al v. Piscitelli et al
as 3:2013cv01137
Plaintiff:
David L. Buess, Winona Mae Palmiotti and W. R. P.
Defendant:
Paul Piscitelli, Andrew M Cuomo, Suffolk County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Andrews et al v. Holmes et al
as 4:2007cv00242
Plaintiff:
Eddie L Andrews, Nancy M Rothschild, Charles D Spencer and others
Defendant:
Jerome A Holmes, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Andrews et al v. Panter et al
as 4:2007cv00200
Plaintiff:
Eddie L Andrews, Rodney Class, Charles D Spencer and others
Defendant:
Deanell Recca Tacha, Jerry Lee Andrews, Alberto Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
