Cases 1 - 10 of 12
WONG et al v. GARLAND
as 1:2021cv02062
Plaintiff:
SHUSHEAN WONG and DAVID LEE KOPLOW
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WONG et al v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2021mc00094
Plaintiff:
SHUSHEAN WONG and DAVID LEE KOPLOW
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and JACQUETTA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. BOYLE et al
as 1:2018cv00618
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE SMITH
Defendant:
TERRENCE BOYLE, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and JOSHUA A. STEIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARNER v. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2013cv00466
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE GARNER
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, GEORGE HERBERT WALKER BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POSEY et al v. FRIEDMAN
as 1:2012cv01953
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE POSEY, TOBIN DOYLE and DAVID SCOTT POSEY
Defendant:
SCOTT M. FRIEDMAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BEEMER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2010cv00954
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE BEEMER
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and KELVIN KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUESS et al v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2009cv02151
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE BUESS and RODNEY DALE CLASS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, DEPARTMENT OF IRS, FRANCHISE CORPORATION STATE OF OHIO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv01358
Petitioner:
DAVID LEE SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and TERRENCE W. BOYLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LEE v. COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS et al
as 1:2009cv01214
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID LEE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS and UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
