Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Rowe v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03958
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Rowe
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LYNN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv27728
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv25139
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYNN HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LYNN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv22340
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson, Sr. v. C.R.Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01250
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R.Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Johnson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETTY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv10563
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYNN PETTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAULS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv04336
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYNN RAULS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REED JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv47909
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYNN REED JR
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lynn et al v. FedEx Office and Print Services, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01959
Plaintiff:
David Lynn, Cynthia Lynn and David R. Lynn
Defendant:
FedEx Offices and Print Services, Inc. and FedEx Office and Print Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LYNN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv10658
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
