Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01416
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01267
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00537
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00514
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
David M Reaves v. Mary Beth Broughman et al
as 2:2011mc00538
Defendant:
Belmont Shore Rugby Club, John Doe Broughman, John Doe Broughman and others
In Re Debtor:
Alva James Bennett and Deborah Cheryl Bennett
Plaintiff:
David M Reaves
Thomas Junghans, et al v. The 12 Percent Fund I, LLC, et al
as 11-17741
Appellant:
THOMAS G. JUNGHANS and RODERICK MCBROOM
Appellee:
THE 12 PERCENT FUND I, LLC, Debtor, DAVID M. REAVES and COYOTE GROWTH MANAGEMENT LLC, Debtor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01937
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Roderick McBroom, et al v. David Reave
as 11-15988
Appellant:
RODERICK MCBROOM and THOMAS G. JUNGHANS
Appellee:
DAVID M. REAVES, Chapter 11 Trustee
Debtor - Appellee:
12 PERCENT FUND I LLC and COYOTE GROWTH MANAGEMENT LLC
Roderick McBroom, et al v. David Reave
as 10-17190
Appellant:
RODERICK R. MCBROOM and THOMAS G. JUNGHANS
Appellee:
DAVID M. REAVES, Chapter 11 Trustee
Debtor - Appellee:
12 PERCENT FUND I LLC and COYOTE GROWTH MANAGEMENT LLC
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. v. David Reaves, et al
as 10-15508
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID M. REAVES, Trustee of Bennett Liquidating Trust, BARBARA PAYNE, wife, THOMAS PAYNE, husband and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
