Cases 1 - 5 of 5
David Masel, et al v. Adriana Villarreal, et al
as 18-40499
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOCTOR DAVID MASEL, DINESH CHANDIRAMANI, NEURON SHIELD, L.L.C. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ADRIANA VILLARREAL, ANTHONY CASAREZ, MEDICAL PRACTICE SOLUTIONS, L.L.C. and others
David Masel v. Adriana Villarreal
as 18-40499
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Doctor David Masel, Dinesh Chandiramani, Neuron Shield, L.L.C. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Adriana Villarreal, Anthony Casarez, Medical Practice Solutions, L.L.C. and others
Masel et al v. Villarreal et al
as 4:2017cv00533
Plaintiff:
Neuron Shield 9, LLC, Neuron Shield 2, LLC, Neuron Shield 7, LLC and others
Defendant:
Medical Practice Solutions, LLC, CGR Investments, LLC, Adriana Villarreal and others
Not Classified By Court:
Hon. Jeff Kaplan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
LSREF2 Baron LLC v. FW Valencia Palms Apartments LP et al
as 3:2013cv00020
Third Party Plaintiff:
Richard Aguilar, FW Valencia Palms Apartments LP and David Masel
Counter Plaintiff:
Richard Aguilar, FW Valencia Palms Apartments LP and David Masel
Defendant:
Richard Aguilar, FW Valencia Palms Apartments LP and David Masel
Counter Defendant:
LSREF2 Baron LLC
Unknown:
Mark Douglas Cronenwett, Mark Douglas Cronenwett and Mark Douglas Cronenwett
Plaintiff:
LSREF2 Baron LLC
Notice Only Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Clerk, El Paso and U.S. Trustee
Third Party Defendant:
Daniel Yanez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
LSREF2 Baron LLC v. FW Valencia Palms Apartments LP et al
as 3:2012cv01242
Plaintiff:
LSREF2 Baron LLC
Defendant:
FW Valencia Palms Apartments LP , Richard Aguilar and David Masel
Counter_claimant:
Richard Aguilar , David Masel and FW Valencia Palms Apartments LP
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Richard Aguilar , David Masel and FW Valencia Palms Apartments LP
Thirdparty_defendant:
Daniel Yanez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
