Cases 11 - 20 of 82
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15553
Plaintiff:
DAVID MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
David Miller, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-10657
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID MILLER, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jones et al v. Tennessee Valley Authority
as 5:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Tommy Jones, Lynn Freeman, Lisbeth Armstrong and others
Defendant:
Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv04791
Plaintiff:
DAVID MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv04496
Plaintiff:
DAVID MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv68181
Plaintiff:
IVAN DAVID MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv67853
Plaintiff:
DAVID MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv63305
Plaintiff:
DAVID MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58016
Plaintiff:
DAVID MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv46618
Plaintiff:
DAVID MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
