Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Staley v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2022cv02028
Plaintiff:
David James Staley
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Rob Jeffreys, Jeffrey M. Dennison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2022cv50295
Plaintiff:
Learnell L. Brown
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Tarry Williams and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheeler v. Mitchelle et al
as 3:2022cv01624
Plaintiff:
David Wheeler
Defendant:
David Mitchelle, Christel Crow, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pompilus v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2022cv01435
Plaintiff:
Dieuseul Pompilus
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Fagerland, Adamski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamon v. Mitchell
as 1:2022cv01212
Petitioner:
Andrew Lamon
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Akins v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2022cv03349
Petitioner:
Francisco Akins
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tackett v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2022cv01260
Plaintiff:
Justin Tackett
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Meyers, Christine Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Clark et al
as 3:2022cv01173
Plaintiff:
Jared R. Crawford
Defendant:
Jayson Clark, Kenny Shires, Harrisburg Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparks v. Mitchell
as 1:2022cv02776
Petitioner:
Terrence Sparks
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Van Pelt v. Mitchell
as 2:2022cv02097
Petitioner:
Ronald M Van Pelt
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
