Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Williams et al v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2022cv02340
Plaintiff:
Jessie Williams, Brandon Jackson and Abdul Love
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Chaplin Arnold, C. Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2022cv02193
Plaintiff:
Learnell L. Brown
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Tarry Williams and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Myers et al
as 3:2022cv02175
Plaintiff:
Jared Michael Smith
Defendant:
Percy Myers, Christine Brown, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staley v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2022cv02028
Plaintiff:
David James Staley
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Rob Jeffreys, Jeffrey M. Dennison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2022cv50295
Plaintiff:
Learnell L. Brown
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Tarry Williams and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheeler v. Mitchelle et al
as 3:2022cv01624
Plaintiff:
David Wheeler
Defendant:
David Mitchelle, Christel Crow, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pompilus v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2022cv01435
Plaintiff:
Dieuseul Pompilus
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Fagerland, Adamski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamon v. Mitchell
as 1:2022cv01212
Petitioner:
Andrew Lamon
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Akins v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2022cv03349
Petitioner:
Francisco Akins
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2022pq01348
Plaintiff:
David Mitchell
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
