Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Nichols et al v. Nichols Contracting, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00451
Plaintiff:
William Nichols and Kandi Nichols
Defendant:
Nichols Contracting, LLC, David Nichols and Judy Nichols
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pecor v. Nichols et al
as 1:2016cv01263
Defendant:
David Nichols, North Point EDC Inc and Billie Jo Ransom
Plaintiff:
Krista Pecor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
In Re: Bank of New York Mellon Corporation Foreign Exchange Transactions Litigation
as 1:2012md02335
Defendant:
Arthur Certosimo, Michael J. Kowalski, Samuel C. Scott, III and others
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System, Lisa Parker, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Retirement Plan and others
Claimant:
Bridgestone Americas, Inc., Bechtel Corporation, SYNNEX Corporation and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, United States Of America and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Bart Florence, Paul Bensi, Jerry Kalmer and others
Petitioner:
Union Asset Management Holding AG, Ironworkers Locals 40, 361 & 417 - Union Security Funds, DeKalb County Pension Fund and others
Interested Party:
David Nichols
Nominal Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
Not Classified By Court:
Non-Party June Kim
Lead Plaintiff:
State of Oregon By and Through the Oregon State Treasurer on Behalf of the Common School Fund and, Together with the Oregon Public Employee Retirement Board, on Behalf of the Oregon Public Employee Re
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Unum Life Insurance Company of America v. Nichols
as 1:2007cv00050
Defendant:
David Nichols
Plaintiff:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America and Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
