Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Davis v. Davies et al
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wayne Davis
Defendant:
Mrs. Davies and David Pedro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macias et al v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Francisco Macias, Menphrey McGhee, John Benge and others
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Tina Kotek, Oregon Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. Pedro et al
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Menphrey Douglas McGee
Defendant:
David Pedro, Liza Emory, B. Kubesh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godstone v. Pedro et al
as 2:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Merlin Godstone
Defendant:
David Pedro, Stuart Young, Heidi Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belander v. Pedro
as 3:2023cv06132
Petitioner:
Damian Belander
Respondent:
Corey Fuhure and David Pedro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Peters et al
as 2:2023cv01552
Plaintiff:
Brandon Murdock James
Defendant:
Ray Peters, L. Campos, Donald W. Golden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delgado v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv00804
Plaintiff:
Baltazar Delgado
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Sue Washburn, David Pedro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miranda v. Pedro
as 2:2023cv00739
Petitioner:
Sintori Lesane Miranda
Respondent:
David Pedro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace v. Nooth et al
as 2:2023cv00704
Plaintiff:
Adam Wallace
Defendant:
Mark Nooth, David Pedro, Lemens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia-Rocio v. Pedro
as 2:2023cv00676
Petitioner:
Cresencio Garcia-Rocio
Respondent:
David Pedro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
