Cases 1 - 10 of 10
(PC) Pierre-Jones v. Campos
as 1:2023cv01372
Plaintiff:
David Pierre-Jones
Defendant:
I. Campos and A. Palencia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierre-Jones v. Campos
as 1:2023at00795
Plaintiff:
David Pierre-Jones
Defendant:
I Campos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Edwards v. Signify Health, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00095
Defendant:
Cure Topco, LLC also known as Censeo Health also known as Censeohealth doing business as Signify Health, LLC doing business as Signify Health Medical Associates, PLLC doing business as Signify Health Medical Associates of California, P.C. doing busin, Bradford Kyle Armbrester, Signify Health, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Paul D.S. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
PIERRE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv20067
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID PIERRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Pierre v. U.S. Attorney General
as 19-10154
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
DAVID PIERRE
United States of America v. Knight (Dussard)
as 18-804
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Louis Knight, David Pierre, Ricardy Louissant and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Neil Dussard
Pierre v. United States of America
as 0:2010cv62065
Plaintiff:
David Pierre
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Peet v. Beard et al
as 3:2010cv00482
Plaintiff:
Lawrence J. Peet and Lawrence J. Peet
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Ph.D., Then Acting Warden of the SCI Camp Hill, John A. Palakovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Veazie et al v. Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C
as 2:2008cv01820
Plaintiff:
Andrew Veazie, Jacqueline Vitatoe, Howard Mouton and others
Defendant:
Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
