Cases 41 - 50 of 87
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03504
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Orlov et al v. Napolitano et al
as 3:2010cv00543
Plaintiff:
Dmitriy M. Orlov and Daria N. Samokhina
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Michael Todd, et al v. City of Aberdeen, et al
as 10-35222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL TODD, GREGORY STACKHOUSE, STEVE BLAI and others
Defendant:
CITY OF ABERDEEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF AUBURN, CITY OF BELLEVUE, CITY OF BONNEY LAKE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-17714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv05278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Tustin Presbyterian Church et al v. Janet Napolitano et al
as 2:2009cv06861
Plaintiff:
Tustin Presbyterian Church and Laura C. Harrison
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Pinghong Liang v. Janet Napditano et al
as 2:2009cv06327
Plaintiff:
Pinghong Liang
Defendant:
Janet Napditano, Michael Aytes and David Roark
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
