Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Rivera v. Hammer et al
as 1:2023cv03700
Plaintiff:
Marcos Rivera
Defendant:
John Hammer, Valerie Monroe, Razia Ferdous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davison v. Bunce et al
as 9:2019cv00653
Defendant:
R. Purlier, Rocque (Female), R. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Davison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Miller et al
as 9:2017cv01332
Plaintiff:
Darryl Williams
Defendant:
Christopher Miller, Merry Harris, David Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Shalett et al
as 1:2016cv09177
Plaintiff:
David Thompson
Defendant:
Bruce Shalett and Todd Meister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acevedo et al v. City of New York, New York
as 1:2015cv10018
Plaintiff:
Francisco Acevedo , Gary Alfred , Dominic Andreno and others
Defendant:
City of New York, New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thompson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv03574
Plaintiff:
David Thompson
Defendant:
City of New York , Jorge Tobon, Jeff Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernard v. Thompson et al
as 9:2014cv01504
Plaintiff:
David Bernard
Defendant:
David Thompson and Mary Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Culinary Health Innovations, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv07293
Plaintiff:
David Thompson
Defendant:
Culinary Health Innovations, LLC, Radius Brand Strategies LLC, Bruce Shalett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cogdell v. Elmira Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv00764
Plaintiff:
James E. Cogdell
Defendant:
Elmira Police Department, John Dunham, William Comstock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv09651
Plaintiff:
David Thompson
Defendant:
The City of New York, Narcotic Boro Manhattan North, The 32nd Precinct and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
