Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Flores v. David & Thompson Mediation Firm et al
as 3:2022cv05630
Plaintiff:
Jorge Flores
Defendant:
David & Thompson Mediation Firm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Securities and Exchange Commission v. David Thompson Laurance
as 8:2022mc00016
Petitioner:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Respondent:
David Thompson Laurance
Lauren Waters v. Timios, Inc.
as 2:2021cv08709
Plaintiff:
Lauren Waters, Jeff Harrington and David Thompson
Defendant:
Timios, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Myron Schellhorn et al v. Timios, Inc.
as 2:2021cv08661
Plaintiff:
Myron Schellhorn, Rodney Allen, Tedda Allen and others
Defendant:
Timios, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Thompson v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv02421
Plaintiff:
Jon David Thompson
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
David Thompson Boyd v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2017cv08599
Respondent:
Dean Borders and Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Petitioner:
David Thompson Boyd
David Thompson Boyd v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 3:2017cv01896
Petitioner:
David Thompson Boyd
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Superior Court of the State of California
Defendant:
Dean Borders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Thompson Boyd v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 2:2017cv06571
Petitioner:
David Thompson Boyd
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Adams et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv05085
Plaintiff:
Neyda Adams , Brian Ahlsted , Grant Blake and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America Inc and Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Unknown
as 2:2017cv00996
Petitioner:
David Thompson
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
