Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Davis Joint Unified School District v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv02925
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Pax Labs Inc, Ploom Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Davis Joint Unified School District
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Davis Joint Unified School District v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03724
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., PAX Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc., Altria Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Davis Joint Unified School District
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Langley et al v. Guiding Hands School, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00635
Defendant:
Le'mon Thomas, Davis Joint Unified School District, Staranne Meyers and others
Plaintiff:
Cherilyn Caler, Robert Darrough, Michael Turelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Randall et al v. Davis Joint Unified School District et al
as 2:2012cv02689
Plaintiff:
Thomas Randall, Jr. and Janet Zwahlen
Defendant:
Davis Joint Unified School District , Susan Lovenburg , Richard Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Fischer
as 2:2007cv02780
Plaintiff:
Guy Fischer, Richard Carillo and Z.F.
Defendant:
Davis Joint Unified School District and David Inns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fischer
as 2:2007at01219
Plaintiff:
Guy Fischer
Defendant:
Davis Joint Unified School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007at00482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
