Cases 21 - 30 of 145
v. Day
as 3:2023cv00368
Claimant:
Roger Charles Day, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Jones v. White et al
as 7:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Tehgrain Jamal Jones
Defendant:
Rick White, C. King, L. Jessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Creel v. Barton et al
as 7:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
John Creel
Defendant:
Lieutenant S. Barton, Lieutenant Mullins, Stacy Day and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thacker v. Virginia Dep't of Corrections et al
as 7:2022cv00707
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Thacker and Matthew L. Thacker
Defendant:
Virginia Dep't of Corrections, Harold W. Clarke, B. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOC LLC et al v. Conner II et al
as 1:2022cv01280
Plaintiff:
SOC LLC and Day & Zimmermann Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Billy Max Conner II and David Ray Johnson
Taylor v. Ravizee et al
as 7:2022cv00635
Plaintiff:
Daniel Taylor
Defendant:
Brenda Ravizee, Roberts, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Clarke
as 7:2022cv00549
Petitioner:
Dai Shawn M. Neal
Respondent:
United States of America and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Rosch et al
as 7:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
Winston NaJee Reed
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Harold Clarke, Warden Jeffery Kiezer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Freeman et al
as 7:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
Leon Jermaine Johnson
Defendant:
A. Freeman, J. Shephard, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Mullins et al
as 7:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Maurice Preston Scott
Defendant:
Sgt. Robinson, Ofc. Thompson, Ofc(s) of A&B Day & Night Shift and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
