Cases 11 - 20 of 63
DeGroot, Derek v. Buesgen, Chris
as 3:2022cv00546
Petitioner:
Derek J. DeGroot
Respondent:
Chris Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryson v. Rozmarynoski et al
as 2:2022cv01043
Plaintiff:
Delorean L Bryson
Defendant:
Lt Rozmarynoski, DeGroot and Does 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson, Titus v. Radtke, Dylan et al
as 2:2022cv00884
Plaintiff:
Titus Henderson
Defendant:
Warden Dylan Radtke, Kevin Carr, Zitek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Pollard et al
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
Michael C Henderson
Defendant:
William Pollard, Steve Scheuler, John Kind and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forester-Hoare v. Radtke et al
as 2:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
Sean Forester-Hoare
Defendant:
Green Bay Correctional Institution, Warden Radtke, Warden Haese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maus v. Eckstein et al
as 2:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Brian A Maus
Defendant:
Scott Eckstein, Schultz, Brant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirksey v. Utter et al
as 2:2021cv01252
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lavell Kirksey
Defendant:
H Utter, A DeGroot, R Snow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson, Titus v. Elsinger, James et al
as 3:2021cv00562
Plaintiff:
Titus Henderson
Defendant:
Capt. James Elsinger, William Swietawkoski, Dylan Radtke and others
Not Classified By Court:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake, Thomas v. Willard-West, Kelli et al
as 3:2021cv00493
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Blake
Defendant:
Kelli Willard-West, Michael Donovan, Dylon Radtke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeGroot, Derek v. Evers, Tony et al
as 3:2021cv00123
Plaintiff:
Derek J. DeGroot
Defendant:
Tony Evers, Jamie Barker, Mario Canziani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
