Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Guaderrama v. City Of Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv01263
Plaintiff:
Christian Guaderrama
Defendant:
City Of Chicago Police Department, Brian DeJesus (Star 21207), Evelyn Grube (Star 99267) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Russell v. Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv01163
Defendant:
Brian DeJesus, Edward Heerdt, City of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
jerrell russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeJesus v. Perma-Pipe Inc.
as 1:2020cv00130
Plaintiff:
Christina DeJesus
Defendant:
Perma-Pipe Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
DeJesus v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv01814
Plaintiff:
Anthony DeJesus
Defendant:
City of Chicago , Chicago Police Officer Miguel Cordero, Star No. 18568 and Michael Cordero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez et al v. Griffin, Star #1061 et al
as 1:2017cv04038
Plaintiff:
Jaime Rodriguez and Carlos DeJesus
Defendant:
Laura Griffin , Michael Hallinan , Unknown Chicago Police Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez et al v. City Of Berwyn Illinois et al
as 1:2016cv05106
Plaintiff:
Rodriguez, DeJesus Dimitri, Vanessa Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
City Of Berwyn Illinois, James Ritz, KARLAS ROBINZINE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tylor v. Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv11359
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tylor
Defendant:
City of Chicago, DeJesus, Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gutierrez v. Dejesus
as 1:2013cv00236
Plaintiff:
Victor Gutierrez
Defendant:
Caesar B Dejesus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abernathy et al v. Chicago
as 1:2012cv00870
Plaintiff:
Tony Abernathy , Phillip Adams , Juan Ahedo and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
