Cases 31 - 38 of 38
DeJesus et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company et al
as 9:2012cv81288
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company and MGLS, INC.
Plaintiff:
Amy DeJesus and Christopher DeJesus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
SOTO-DEJESUS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2010cv05323
Plaintiff:
DENISE SOTO-DEJESUS
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY , GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY , GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOTO-DEJESUS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv05323
Plaintiff:
DENISE SOTO-DEJESUS
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOTO-DEJESUS et al v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv05135
Plaintiff:
DENISE SOTO-DEJESUS and DEMYLEE PABLOS
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wooding et al v. Yeager et al
as 1:2009cv00623
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wooding and Rosemary Rios Santiago
Defendant:
Jessica Yeager and Jamie Dejesus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio v. DeJesus
as 4:2009cv01525
Plaintiff:
Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio
Interpleader:
Mirian DeJesus
Defendant:
Susana DeJesus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Sanshuck et al v. Guzman et al
as 1:2008cv02318
Plaintiff:
Bryan Sanshuck, Bryan Sanshuck, Bryan Sanshuck and others
Defendant:
Heriberto Melendez Guzman, Electronic Payment Services Corp., FBS Commerciales, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
